<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for the.blog @scwleung</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scwleung.ca/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scwleung.ca</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:37:06 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Privacy? In this age? Please&#8230; by Sam C.W. Leung</title>
		<link>http://blog.scwleung.ca/2010/02/20/privacy-in-this-age-please/comment-page-1/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam C.W. Leung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scwleung.ca/2010/02/20/privacy-in-this-age-please/#comment-751</guid>
		<description>Definitely haven&#039;t drunk tweeted, which isn&#039;t to say I haven&#039;t tweeted while drinking. I&#039;m sure it&#039;ll happen some day :-) and it will be glorious :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely haven&#8217;t drunk tweeted, which isn&#8217;t to say I haven&#8217;t tweeted while drinking. I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;ll happen some day <img src='http://blog.scwleung.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  and it will be glorious <img src='http://blog.scwleung.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Privacy? In this age? Please&#8230; by selinajane</title>
		<link>http://blog.scwleung.ca/2010/02/20/privacy-in-this-age-please/comment-page-1/#comment-750</link>
		<dc:creator>selinajane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scwleung.ca/2010/02/20/privacy-in-this-age-please/#comment-750</guid>
		<description>Ha ha! I am the queen of TMI

I think we&#039;re all starting to get there though. You&#039;ll find yourself drunk Twittering one day I&#039;m sure! Ha ha! ;) I&#039;ve done that a few times. Fun and funny as hell the next day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha! I am the queen of TMI</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;re all starting to get there though. You&#8217;ll find yourself drunk Twittering one day I&#8217;m sure! Ha ha! <img src='http://blog.scwleung.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  I&#8217;ve done that a few times. Fun and funny as hell the next day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Privacy? In this age? Please&#8230; by Sam C.W. Leung</title>
		<link>http://blog.scwleung.ca/2010/02/20/privacy-in-this-age-please/comment-page-1/#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam C.W. Leung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scwleung.ca/2010/02/20/privacy-in-this-age-please/#comment-749</guid>
		<description>Yea...not being on Facebook is still quite a shock to the system. There are moments of weakness when my fingers have a mind of its own and I end up at the FB login page. I catch myself at the last minute though...

I&#039;ve been finding myself traipsing the &quot;living in public&quot; line...there&#039;s still a lot of stuff I start typing [into Twitter or here on the blog, or otherwise] and stop, scrapping it all, and just letting it sit in my head. I think my mind is still very much self-censoring itself with the TMI filter. I&#039;m sure it&#039;ll crumble eventually too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea&#8230;not being on Facebook is still quite a shock to the system. There are moments of weakness when my fingers have a mind of its own and I end up at the FB login page. I catch myself at the last minute though&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been finding myself traipsing the &#8220;living in public&#8221; line&#8230;there&#8217;s still a lot of stuff I start typing [into Twitter or here on the blog, or otherwise] and stop, scrapping it all, and just letting it sit in my head. I think my mind is still very much self-censoring itself with the TMI filter. I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;ll crumble eventually too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Privacy? In this age? Please&#8230; by selinajane</title>
		<link>http://blog.scwleung.ca/2010/02/20/privacy-in-this-age-please/comment-page-1/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>selinajane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scwleung.ca/2010/02/20/privacy-in-this-age-please/#comment-748</guid>
		<description>It always amazes me how few people (marketers included) know how to adjust their privacy settings. people&#039;s accounts are just wide open with personal photographs, personal information and all. Facebook is the worst for that, I guess because they make it more difficult to adjust... But people need to be more proactive about learning how to use the privacy settings.

I&#039;m on the liberal end of privacy and tend to share a lot more with people than most people are comfortable with, but I am moving towards a public personality so I don&#039;t mind. I kind of want to share things and have random interactions with people I meet online. I love that!

You gave up on Facebook? {shock}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It always amazes me how few people (marketers included) know how to adjust their privacy settings. people&#8217;s accounts are just wide open with personal photographs, personal information and all. Facebook is the worst for that, I guess because they make it more difficult to adjust&#8230; But people need to be more proactive about learning how to use the privacy settings.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m on the liberal end of privacy and tend to share a lot more with people than most people are comfortable with, but I am moving towards a public personality so I don&#8217;t mind. I kind of want to share things and have random interactions with people I meet online. I love that!</p>
<p>You gave up on Facebook? {shock}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2010 Forecast by Sam C.W. Leung</title>
		<link>http://blog.scwleung.ca/2010/01/01/2010-forecast/comment-page-1/#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam C.W. Leung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 18:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scwleung.ca/2010/01/01/2010-forecast/#comment-747</guid>
		<description>Eya, you&#039;re right re: industry decline. Stupid me for not proofing and writing blog posts on busses :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eya, you&#8217;re right re: industry decline. Stupid me for not proofing and writing blog posts on busses <img src='http://blog.scwleung.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2010 Forecast by dzlotnik</title>
		<link>http://blog.scwleung.ca/2010/01/01/2010-forecast/comment-page-1/#comment-746</link>
		<dc:creator>dzlotnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 18:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scwleung.ca/2010/01/01/2010-forecast/#comment-746</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused, Sam. Canadian industry will continue to decline *despite* the CDN reaching parity? Shouldn&#039;t that be *because of*?

Also, I hear we&#039;ve gotten really good at hocket -- we might actually win!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused, Sam. Canadian industry will continue to decline *despite* the CDN reaching parity? Shouldn&#8217;t that be *because of*?</p>
<p>Also, I hear we&#8217;ve gotten really good at hocket &#8212; we might actually win!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2009: The Year The World Burned by Darcy</title>
		<link>http://blog.scwleung.ca/2009/12/19/2009-the-year-the-world-burned/comment-page-1/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>Darcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scwleung.ca/?p=260#comment-745</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m almost afraid to ask.  

Come to New Year&#039;s!  I can&#039;t promise 2010 will be awesome, but I can guarantee a fun party. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m almost afraid to ask.  </p>
<p>Come to New Year&#8217;s!  I can&#8217;t promise 2010 will be awesome, but I can guarantee a fun party. <img src='http://blog.scwleung.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shoot! At the Pretty People! by Carol</title>
		<link>http://blog.scwleung.ca/2009/09/27/shoot-at-the-pretty-people/comment-page-1/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scwleung.ca/2009/09/27/shoot-at-the-pretty-people/#comment-619</guid>
		<description>&quot;Seriously, if we found a way to artificially prevent blinking in models, we would have significantly improved the world of fashion and fashion photography.&quot;

I wonder if this is discussed in modelling techniques. Perhaps you should start watching America/Canada&#039;s Next Top Model for tips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Seriously, if we found a way to artificially prevent blinking in models, we would have significantly improved the world of fashion and fashion photography.&#8221;</p>
<p>I wonder if this is discussed in modelling techniques. Perhaps you should start watching America/Canada&#8217;s Next Top Model for tips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pouring Flaming Gasoline on Fire: The UW Logo&#8230;Issue? by Darcy</title>
		<link>http://blog.scwleung.ca/2009/07/25/pouring-flaming-gasoline-on-fire-the-uw-logo-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>Darcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scwleung.ca/2009/07/25/pouring-flaming-gasoline-on-fire-the-uw-logo-issue/#comment-542</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m kind of indifferent.  I liked the *old* old logo, before they did the typeface with the weird serifs and made all the lions the same.  

I do find it all kind of funny, tho.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://whoyoucallingajesse.com/past/2009/7/22/branding_in_higher_ed_observations/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jesse Rodgers&lt;/a&gt; has an interesting perspective on #uwlogogate, having being UW staff for a while and being in a position where he has to represent UW to groovy entrepreneurial types.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m kind of indifferent.  I liked the *old* old logo, before they did the typeface with the weird serifs and made all the lions the same.  </p>
<p>I do find it all kind of funny, tho.</p>
<p><a href="http://whoyoucallingajesse.com/past/2009/7/22/branding_in_higher_ed_observations/" rel="nofollow">Jesse Rodgers</a> has an interesting perspective on #uwlogogate, having being UW staff for a while and being in a position where he has to represent UW to groovy entrepreneurial types.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pouring Flaming Gasoline on Fire: The UW Logo&#8230;Issue? by Mark Cook</title>
		<link>http://blog.scwleung.ca/2009/07/25/pouring-flaming-gasoline-on-fire-the-uw-logo-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 04:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scwleung.ca/2009/07/25/pouring-flaming-gasoline-on-fire-the-uw-logo-issue/#comment-541</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t care about the logo when I was a student either.  But the new one - the impression it makes with me is neon lines without purpose (which I guess makes me slightly more charitable than Jos; in that I think the colouring is vintage 1988 instead of 1978).

It feels like the new logo is &lt;i&gt;almost&lt;/i&gt; a clean, bold logo for the future; but that they managed to to make it say the opposite by scribbling on it with highlighters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t care about the logo when I was a student either.  But the new one &#8211; the impression it makes with me is neon lines without purpose (which I guess makes me slightly more charitable than Jos; in that I think the colouring is vintage 1988 instead of 1978).</p>
<p>It feels like the new logo is <i>almost</i> a clean, bold logo for the future; but that they managed to to make it say the opposite by scribbling on it with highlighters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
