Oh…where to even begin with this silly issue that isn’t a simple regurgitation of what’s already been stated. For those of you who don’t already have a good grasp of the situation, I’d refer you to here and here [courtesy of ink_13], as well as here [courtesy of UW's Daily Bulletin]. Also, I’m sure you’ll find plenty of discussion across Twitter, Facebook and pretty much where students and alumni hang out.

While most of the talk out there is negatively slanted against the new logo, I have to admit that I’m actually quite ambivalent [leaning towards not dislike] about the new logo. As my esteemed colleague Mr. Felix stated on Facebook [I] didn’t give a flying fuck about the logo when [I] was a student. so why would i give a fucking shit about it now. holy shit, this is completely stupid. In many ways, I agree with the sentiment. Venting on Facebook or LiveJournal, or wherever will not change the logo. I certainly think that students, staff and alumni all should have a say in this, and I will defend your right to say it [as our good friend Voltaire stated]. However, I am concerned with many of the arguments that are being put forward. While I don’t wish to dig too deeply into each and every one of them, I do want to address a small number.

On Re-Branding
There’s a lot of arguments that the new logo is ‘non-traditional’ or that moving away from the classic crest is a huge problem. I respect those arguments. After all, every other school is deeply rooted in tradition and have their own crests representing its core values and traditions. There are two major points I wish to say against this. Firstly, Waterloo has been pushing towards a branding that separates itself from other schools – one that focuses on innovation and standing out from the rest of the pack as a leader. A part of leadership involves blue-sky thinking, taking leaps of faith, and shunning tradition at times. I applaud UW in trying something new and different. Secondly, how many of us UW students and alumni actually understand the core values and traditions of UW based upon the crest-logo? How many of us even know what UW’s slogan translates to in English? Hell. How many of us even know UW’s slogan?

While I can’t say much about the style and artistry of the new logo, I believe it does a good job in representing what UW is today. It is also a symbol that is much easier to interpret for all.

On Marketing and the University-Corporation
The re-branding initiative has brought about a side-argument that the UW administration is running the school more as a corporation than an academic institution. Furthermore, that this shift in direction is a bad thing, and that it hinders academic research and innovation. I will admit that this can happen. However, it’s also important to realize that even a University requires money to operate, and funding is limited. Universities need to efficiently use its funds to deliver a high quality education and to conduct research that will see through to a conclusion. A university should be able to cut funding from a professor if he or she is not able to both teach effectively and conduct world class research. Is it little wonder that many universities require research grants from industry? Yes, there are plenty of arguments that universities shouldn’t be tainted by industry, but let’s not kid ourselves – accepting money from the government can be just as bad and just as biased. By running the university as efficiently [and I guess corporately] as possible, the university would be better able to have its own say about the overall agenda.

I guess this little piece took a bit wider turn than necessary. However, I just needed to get it off my chest. It is stupid and ridiculous how much we stick by what’s already there, rather than trying something new. Automatically rejecting something new and unknown is probably the worse thing that we can do for our society and culture. I think we need to be more objective and analytical about change. Why don’t we let the new logo sit with us a bit more – maybe we’ll all find something we like about it.

I’ll leave comments open. I’ll try to approve messages that aren’t childish or made in bad taste, but don’t expect me to respond. I’ve made my peace with the issue.

Thanks for reading!

  1. Jos Said,

    I believe my favourite response to the UW Logo has been from sqrt_joy on LJ who said:

    “Water, water water!”

    [Laser sounds] “Pew, pew, pew!”

    I liked the old logo. I don’t care for the new one, but not for the same reasons that others dislike it…I just don’t think it looks nice.

    It’s got the colouring I would expect to see in the 70s and I’m not really sure what those coloured lines are supposed to mean/represent. But most of all, it’s impractical. The old logo was 3 colours – easy to brand tshirts, promotional items, etc. The new logo has so many colours that screening a shirt will cost an arm and a leg.

    In the business world, it doesn’t make a lot of sense to me because of the cost associated with it and the fact that people DO recognize the UW logo…

    I wonder if admin ever considered having a logo contest. Did they have one? SO many talented people studying and working there…someone was bound to come up with something a little more “now” and a little more acceptable (without being musty and traditional).

  2. Stela Said,

    You know, I don’t mind the fact that Waterloo got a new logo. You know what I do mind? That the resulting logo was the obvious pick of a panel of people who have no sense of design (or taste for that matter). It was chosen by *amateurs*.
    Graphic designers go through this trouble a lot. They will create a palette of designs to choose from, and unfailingly the clients will always pick the ugliest one. Just talk to Liz about this sometime…

    I mean, what is that? ARIAL FONT?! And lasers?! That won’t even work small! Or in black/white! Do you even know how much it costs to print a full-colour logo? There’s a reason most companies stick to one to two colours. D: That design is so uninspired, unmemorable (except for how ugly it is) and *boring* that it makes me cry. No seriously. Who chose this thing?!

    So my issues with this are purely superficial. haha (I thought UW was having financial troubles, why the logo change now?)

    Ah well. 9_9

    I did like the “Come to Waterloo! We Has Lasers, Pew pew!” So if nothing else, this made me laugh.

  3. Mark Cook Said,

    I didn’t care about the logo when I was a student either. But the new one – the impression it makes with me is neon lines without purpose (which I guess makes me slightly more charitable than Jos; in that I think the colouring is vintage 1988 instead of 1978).

    It feels like the new logo is almost a clean, bold logo for the future; but that they managed to to make it say the opposite by scribbling on it with highlighters.

  4. Darcy Said,

    I’m kind of indifferent. I liked the *old* old logo, before they did the typeface with the weird serifs and made all the lions the same.

    I do find it all kind of funny, tho.

    Jesse Rodgers has an interesting perspective on #uwlogogate, having being UW staff for a while and being in a position where he has to represent UW to groovy entrepreneurial types.

Add A Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Socialized through Gregarious 33